I Asked Why Immigration Officers Tripled in 30 days. The Answer: a $48,000 Bill.
I obtained an internal sheriff’s office policy on immigration enforcement. After a $48,000 records fight, I’m publishing the document for the public to read.
This newsletter is produced independently. If you want to support this work, please consider becoming a paid subscriber, making a one-time contribution or sponsoring my work. Your support helps keep this reporting and writing going.
A few weeks ago, I filed a public records request while reporting on immigration enforcement in Florida.
The response wasn’t records. It was an invoice: $48,394.05.
The agency said my request returned more than 63,000 documents and would require over 1,200 hours of review before anything could be released.
I asked how they calculated that number. I offered to narrow the request. I asked for guidance on how to make it workable.
No explanation so far. Just notices that the request will close if the bill isn’t paid.
It’s about to close now. So I’m going to show you what I was trying to find.
Because even without the information I requested, there’s one document I got back that is worth seeing.
The question that triggered the bill
While reporting on immigration enforcement, I learned that the Miami-Dade Sheriff’s Office had rapidly increased the number of deputies certified to perform immigration enforcement functions.
On January 1, the department had 100 designated immigration officers. By the end of the month, it had 334. (This new detail was published in my recent piece for The Guardian).
More than triple. In less than 30 days.
That kind of change doesn’t happen quietly without a reason.
So I filed a records request asking for communications explaining what prompted the expansion — emails, memos, directives, anything showing who ordered it and why.
That request is what produced the $48,000 estimate.
This is what I meant when I recently wrote:
Censorship isn’t always a ban.
Sometimes it’s a bill.
Large newsrooms can sometimes absorb costs like that, or have lawyers on retainers that will help negotiate it down. Independent journalists usually can’t and don’t.
And when access comes with a price tag this high, it quietly decides which stories move forward — and which never get told.
The policy most people never read
While working on that request, I obtained something else: A new internal policy titled “Chapter 21 - Part 04, Immigration Enforcement.”
Twelve pages, added quietly to the sheriff’s office standard operating procedures in November 2025.
About a month later, the number of deputies certified to carry out immigration enforcement functions more than tripled — the sudden increase that led me to file the records request that later produced the $48,000 bill.
Policies like this rarely make headlines. They’re written internally. Approved internally. Filed into manuals the public almost never sees.
But this one matters.
Under the policy, deputies certified through the federal 287(g) program can perform expanded immigration enforcement functions while working their regular assignments.
Among many other notable details, this one stood out: If a deputy develops what the policy calls “reasonable suspicion” that someone may be undocumented, they can run an immigration check through federal databases.
If the person is flagged, the deputy must call a designated immigration officer. Once that officer confirms an administrative warrant, deputies may carry out a civil immigration arrest — even if no state or local criminal charges exist.
The policy outlines how certified deputies can initiate immigration checks and how those encounters must be documented and reported.
It does not describe every step that happens after someone is taken into custody. But in reporting on how the procedures are actually carried out, I learned that people may first be brought to police headquarters, where a certified immigration officer conducts an immigration status check and contacts federal authorities if there is a match.
The policy itself acknowledges that civil immigration warrants are not judicial warrants. Yet it creates a framework that allows local deputies to act on them, collect detailed biographical information, and report immigration-related encounters to the state.
What exists on paper as policy can, in practice, extend immigration enforcement into routine local policing in ways the public rarely sees.
Read the policy yourself
Most people never get to see documents like this.
You hear about enforcement, the politics, the arrests. But the actual rules — the language, the procedures, the definitions — usually stay inside the department.
So I’m publishing the policy here.
Take a look.
This isn’t just about one county
Across the country, local law enforcement agencies are expanding partnerships that allow officers to perform federal immigration enforcement functions.
Some of those changes happen through legislation. Others happen through internal policies most people never know exist.
And when someone tries to understand how those decisions were made, the answer can come back as a stack of documents — or a bill too large to pay.
Public records laws are supposed to make government transparent. But cost, delay, and complexity can turn access into something only large institutions can afford.
That matters for journalists. It matters for communities. And it matters for anyone who wants to know how power is actually being used.
Because these records don’t belong to reporters. They belong to the public.
What I still want to know
I still want to know what prompted the urgency. I still want to understand why the number of certified immigration officers tripled in one month.
For now, this is what we have.
— Monique
Have a tip? Send to monique.twocanbetrue@gmail.com or message me for Signal details.
Ways to Support This Work
Independent reporting like this is reader-supported. If you’d like to help sustain it, here are a few ways:
1. Become a paid subscriber
Subscribe monthly or annually to support original reporting and essays on Two Can Be True.
2. Make a one-time contribution
If subscriptions aren’t your thing, you can safely support my reporting directly here.
Organizations, newsrooms, universities, and individuals can sponsor current and future reporting projects, workshops, or investigative series or creative projects. Sponsorships help fund the time, travel, and records work that independent reporting often requires. They do not influence editorial decisions.
4. Help the reporting reach more people
• Share this story on social media and/group chats
• Forward this newsletter to a friend
• Reply with tips, ideas, or feedback
Every bit of support helps keep independent journalism alive. Thank you for being part of this community.
The county I covet has an open race for sheriff this year, and my understanding is they have both said they will sign 287(g) agreements. This new policy in Miami-Dade should rightfully give us all pause and prompt us to question our elected officials more closely.